Video Programs

Dr Sekeres discusses how he approaches second-line therapy selection in ESA-refractory, transfusion-dependent lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) patients, specifically with imetelstat.

Dr Sekeres discusses treatment goals for a patient with lower-risk MDS.

Dr Sekeres discusses how he approaches second-line therapy selection in ESA-refractory, transfusion-dependent lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) patients, specifically with luspatercept.

Dr Sekeres discusses key takeaways for optimizing anemia management in lower-risk MDS, as well as where he sees the most significant unmet needs.

Dr Sekeres discusses how he approaches second-line therapy selection in ESA-refractory, transfusion-dependent lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) patients, specifically with lenalidomide.

Dr Sekeres shares his thoughts about the choice between an EMA and a telomerase inhibitor in the RS-negative patient.

Dr Sekeres discusses the adverse event profile and AE management of imetelstat.

Matthew Campbell, MD, MS, and Rana McKay, MD, conclude by addressing the remaining unmet needs and persistent treatment challenges faced in managing patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

The panelists examine the CheckMate-67T study, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of nivolumab in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

The panelists compare the adverse event profiles of immunotherapy combination (IO/IO) versus immunotherapy plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO/TKI) regimens, and address the economic implications of managing long-term side effects.

The key opinion leaders share their strategies for selecting systemic therapy, comparing immunotherapy combination (IO/IO) versus immunotherapy plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO/TKI) approaches, for previously untreated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Medical experts specializing in clear cell renal cell carcinoma examine the concept of treatment-free survival in immunotherapy/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO/TKI) regimens, addressing both the advantages and potential drawbacks.

Dr. Campbell evaluates the efficacy and safety results from the 55-month analysis of the CheckMate-9ER trial, and explores the considerations for discontinuing or continuing immunotherapy (IO) in IO/IO versus IO/TKI combination regimens.

The key opinion leaders examine the data from the KEYNOTE-426 trial, focusing on safety and efficacy outcomes along with other pertinent updates.

Matthew Campbell, MD, MS, analyzes the crucial efficacy and safety results from the CLEAR trial's 4-year final analysis, incorporating insights on how these findings influence clinical decision-making for treatment-naïve patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Rana McKay, MD, examines the pivotal efficacy and safety outcomes from the 8-year follow-up of the CheckMate-214 trial in treatment-naïve patients, presented at ASCO GU 2024, and discusses how these findings impact clinical practice.

Chris Benton, MD, provides an overview of first-line treatment options for patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS).

Dr Katy Beckermann introduces the panel of experts and addresses the first clinical case in this series, highlighting intermediate-risk, metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

The key opinion leaders explore extended follow-up results from the CheckMate-214 clinical trial.

Matthew Campbell, MD, MS, and Rana McKay, MD, offer a concise review of existing treatment approaches for clear cell renal cell carcinoma across risk categories, along with considerations for sequencing therapies.

A key opinion leader addresses the persistent challenges and unmet needs in the management of advanced urothelial carcinoma, while offering their insight into the future direction and potential advancements within this rapidly evolving field of oncology.

A leading medical authority shares their hands-on experience with sacituzumab govitecan, focusing on the primary toxicity concerns, such as diarrhea and neutropenia, and outlining effective management strategies to mitigate these adverse effects and optimize patient care.

A key opinion leader delves into the intricacies of second-line and third-line treatment sequencing for patients with progressive disease, addressing the appropriate timing for repeat testing and elaborating on the critical factors that inform their personalized treatment approach.

A medical professional outlines their preferred first-line treatment strategy for managing patients diagnosed with metastatic urothelial carcinoma, providing valuable insights into their clinical decision-making process.

A leading expert in the field shares their insights on the specific biomarkers they evaluate, such as Trop2, FGFR, and PD-L1, and the optimal timing for conducting these tests based on their clinical experience and patient management strategies.

A key opinion leader offers a comprehensive overview of the present landscape of molecular testing in metastatic urothelial cancer, elaborating on how advancements in molecular testing have shaped his clinical practice and expressing optimism for their future incorporation into the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.

A urology expert elucidates the collaborative relationship between medical oncology and urology in terms of diagnostic testing, treatment strategies, and patient referrals, while underscoring the crucial role of a multidisciplinary approach in maximizing positive patient outcomes.

A key opinion leader presents a case study of a 73-year-old male patient diagnosed with metastatic urothelial carcinoma, highlighting the associated risk factors and challenges in establishing an accurate diagnosis.