Video Programs

Panelists discuss real-world evidence on dose escalation of luspatercept in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS) (Patel et al, EHA 2024), highlighting its clinical benefits in improving patient outcomes, and share insights from the MAXILUS trial (Della Porta et al, EHA 2024), considering how this dosing strategy could influence clinical practice and enhance patient care.

A panelist discusses how molecular testing results, including ESR1 mutations, PIK3CA alterations, and other genomic findings, directly inform treatment decisions and sequencing of therapies for patients with MBC.

Hope S. Rugo, MD, FASCO, discusses how circulating tumor DNA testing enables real-time monitoring of disease progression, detection of emerging mutations, and assessment of treatment response in patients with MBC.

Panelists discuss dosing strategies for frontline luspatercept in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, emphasizing individualized approaches to optimize efficacy and minimize adverse effects based on patient response and clinical factors.

Panelists discuss how intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy may reduce infection risk in patients with multiple myeloma who are receiving teclistamab treatment.

Panelists discuss how minimal residual disease assessment demonstrates superior depth of response with ciltacabtagene autoleucel compared with standard of care in patients who have lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma and received 1 to 3 prior therapies.

Panelists discuss how adding a fourth drug (daratumumab) to standard triplet induction therapy may improve outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible multiple myeloma.

Panelists discuss how the AQUILA trial evaluated whether daratumumab monotherapy provides superior outcomes compared with active monitoring in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma patients.

A panelist discusses how a new phase 2 study investigating the combination of loncastuximab tesirine plus rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma aims to build upon earlier promising results by evaluating efficacy, safety, and durability of response in a larger patient population.

Experts examine both overall survival outcomes and independent review committee–assessed progression-free survival data from the AMPLIFY trial.

Panelists discuss how to approach treatment decisions for a 74-year-old patient with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patient, considering factors such as age, comorbidities, and available therapeutic options to develop an optimal care plan.

Aimee Merino, MD, discusses how the identification, evaluation, and management of high-risk disease in early relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM) involves prioritizing specific risk factors, distinguishing functional high-risk patients from those with standard risk, and tailoring treatment strategies accordingly.

Thomas W. LeBlanc, MD, MA, discusses how the COMMANDS study, which compared luspatercept to epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)–naive, transfusion-dependent patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS), demonstrated the long-term clinical value of luspatercept in improving hemoglobin levels and reducing transfusion dependence, with updated efficacy results presented by Garcia-Manero et al at ASH 2024.

A panelist discusses how infusion-related reactions to monoclonal antibodies in EGFR-mutated NSCLC can be effectively managed through preventive measures demonstrated in the phase 2 SKIPPirr trial.

Evan Y. Yu, MD, discusses how individualized first-line systemic therapy selection for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) involves considering factors such as disease burden, patient performance status, and comorbidities while weighing the pros and cons of current options—such as chemotherapy-sparing regimens, androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) selection, and the use of triplet versus doublet combination therapies—to optimize efficacy and minimize adverse effects based on each patient’s unique clinical profile.

James J. Harding, MD, reviews the ongoing phase 3 CheckMate 9DW trial, which is investigating nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) vs lenvatinib or sorafenib as first-line (1L) treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

Evan Y. Yu, MD, discusses how systemic therapy options for newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer include androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with chemotherapy or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) such as abiraterone or enzalutamide, with the choice of frontline treatment depending on factors such as disease burden and patient characteristics, while also considering the structural and physical differences between these ARPIs, which may influence their efficacy and adverse effect profiles.

A panelist discusses how molecular testing for patients with MBC who relapse during or shortly after adjuvant endocrine therapy is crucial for detecting ESR1 mutations and other resistance mechanisms that can inform subsequent treatment selection.

Panelists discuss how mutational burden influences the duration of response to frontline luspatercept in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS), as observed in the COMMANDS trial (Komrokji et al, EHA 2024), and when luspatercept should be chosen as a first-line treatment, considering its use before or alongside transfusion; they also explore the impact of luspatercept on hemoglobin levels and quality of life (Oliva et al, EHA 2024; Santini et al, ASH 2024), and the key factors in selecting between available treatment options for initial anemia management.

A panelist discusses how comprehensive molecular testing at MBC diagnosis, including genomic profiling and ESR1 mutation status, helps guide treatment decisions and identify potential therapeutic targets.

Panelists discuss how mutational burden impacts the response to frontline luspatercept in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS), highlighting its role in predicting treatment outcomes and the duration of transfusion independence.

Panelist discusses how there are many significant attributes of the bispecific antibody, which has broader applicability and can be used in widespread community centers. There are more community centers that are staring to use bispecific antibodies, and there is now a much lower rate of CRS and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS).

Hope S. Rugo, MD, FASCO, discusses the role of abemaciclib plus elacestrant for ER+/HER2– MBC from data presented at SABCS 2024.

Panelists discuss key takeaways from the COMMANDS trial, including the analysis of biomarkers in responders by ribosomal stress status (Hayati et al, EHA 2024), the impact of luspatercept on cell lineages (Garcia-Manero et al, EHA 2024), and the long-term clinical value of extended RBC transfusion independence (RBC-TI) (Garcia-Manero et al, ASH 2024).

Panelists discuss how the final efficacy and safety analysis from the COMMANDS trial (Della Porta et al, Lancet 2024) highlights the role of luspatercept in first-line treatment for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS), with particular consideration of ribosomal stress (RS) status and serum erythropoietin (EPO) levels, emphasizing its potential to improve hemoglobin levels and transfusion independence in this patient population.

A panelist discusses how the phase 2 ELECTRA trial studies elacestrant in combination with ribociclib as first-line therapy for ER+/HER2– advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Dr. Joshua Sabari discusses the impact that identification of common and rare actionable alterations has had on personalized therapy selection and improved outcomes for patients with NSCLC.

A panelist discusses how managing relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (R/R FL) requires carefully weighing multiple factors including patient fitness, prior therapies, duration of response, symptoms, and treatment goals while confronting challenges like treatment resistance, cumulative toxicities, and the lack of a clear standard of care sequence.