Video Programs

1 KOL is featured in this series.

A panelist discusses how second-line treatment options for kidney cancer have evolved through multiple clinical trials including Study 205, METEOR, CONTACT-03, TIVO-3, TiNivo-2, and LITESPARK-005, which have demonstrated varying efficacy across different patient populations and prior therapies, particularly noting the impact of prior immunotherapy exposure on treatment selection and the need for careful consideration of historical trial data in the context of modern treatment paradigms.

1 expert in this video

The panelist discusses how, Healthcare professionals manage distinct toxicities with ami+laz (IRRs, rash) and osi+chemotherapyctx (cytopenias, diarrhea, fatigue). SKIPPirr informs IRR mitigation in ami’s first infusion. Proactive AE strategies include premedication, dose adjustments, supportive care, and monitoring.

1 KOL is featured in this series.

A panelist discusses how second-line therapy goals typically shift from pursuing complete remission (as in first-line treatment) to focusing more on disease control, quality of life management, and balancing treatment effectiveness with tolerability based on the patient's prior therapy experience.

1 expert in this video

The panelist discusses how, when discussing first-line treatment decisions for cancer patients, healthcare professionals primarily consider patient-specific factors like disease stage, molecular profile, comorbidities, and performance status. When discussing options with high-risk patients, healthcare professionals typically take a shared decision-making approach, thoroughly explaining both potential benefits and side effect management strategies. These conversations weigh factors like quality-of-life impact, monitoring requirements, and individual patient preferences to arrive at an optimal treatment strategy.

4 experts are featured in this series.

Panelists discuss how the paradigm in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) has shifted to considering which patients should not receive quadruplet CD38-containing regimens rather than who should, given the compelling efficacy data supporting this approach.