Opinion|Videos|July 29, 2025

Evolving Treatment Paradigms for Patients With Treatment-Naive CLL

Panelists discuss how the treatment landscape for treatment-naive patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is rapidly evolving with new guideline updates every 6 to 12 months. They categorize approaches into fixed-duration vs continuous treatment strategies while emphasizing the need to study different molecular subtypes of CLL separately in future clinical trials.

Video content above is prompted by the following:

The CLL treatment landscape for treatment-naive patients is rapidly evolving, with new guidelines updating every 6 to 12 months. Experts now categorize frontline treatments into 2 primary approaches: fixed-duration regimens and continuous therapy options. Fixed-duration treatments include the established combination of obinutuzumab plus venetoclax and emerging combinations like acalabrutinib plus venetoclax. Meanwhile, continuous treatment options feature covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors such as acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, and ibrutinib, with or without anti-CD20 antibodies.

Recent long-term follow-up data from pivotal phase 3 studies comparing these newer agents with earlier generations of BTK inhibitors and chemoimmunotherapy reveal distinct molecular subtypes of CLL with varying treatment responses. This molecular heterogeneity suggests that patients with different genomic profiles may benefit from tailored therapeutic approaches, particularly those with high-risk features such as deletion 17p and TP53 mutations.

The future of CLL treatment lies in precision medicine approaches that will likely study different patient populations separately based on their molecular characteristics. This stratified approach promises to optimize outcomes by matching the right treatment to the right patient, moving beyond the current one-size-fits-all paradigm toward truly personalized CLL therapy based on individual molecular profiles and risk stratification.


Latest CME