
Usmani on D-VRd's Efficacy/Safety in Transplant-Ineligible NDMM
Saad Z. Usmani, MD, MBA, FRCP, FASCO, chief of Myeloma Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discusses the efficacy and safety findings of a subgroup analysis from the phase 3 CEPHEUS trial (NCT03652064) that were presented at the
According to the subgroup analyses, the combination of daratumumab (Darzalex) and bortezomib (Velcade), lenalidomide (Revlimid), and dexamethasone (D-VRd) improved both responses and survival vs VRd alone when used for the treatment of patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).
Specifically, higher overall minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response (CR) or better rates were seen with D-VRd, as it led to substantially higher rates of MRD negativity at both 10−5 (60.4% with D-VRd vs 39.3% with VRd; OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.47-3.80; P =.0004), and at a threshold of 10–6 (45.8% vs 26.9%), respectively (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.40-3.73). A significantly higher percentage of patients on D-VRd achieved sustained MRD-negative CR or better for at least 12 months and 24 months, indicating more durable responses.
D-VRd also significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS). After a median follow-up of nearly 5 years, the median PFS was not reached with D-VRd, compared with 49.6 months with VRd (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35-0.74; P =.0003), representing a 49% reduction in the risk of progression or death. While overall survival (OS) showed a strong trend towards improvement with D-VRd (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.42-1.03; P =.0682), it became statistically significant when accounting for deaths associated with COVID-19, suggesting a true OS benefit.
The safety profile of D-VRd was consistent with known risks, with no new concerns identified. Common adverse events were manageable, and notably, treatment discontinuation due to side effects was lower in the D-VRd arm.
These findings strongly reinforce D-VRd as a standard of care for transplant-ineligible NDMM, offering deeper and more durable responses, extended PFS, and a favorable overall risk-benefit profile.







































