
Updated NCCN Guidelines Add Lurbinectedin Maintenance in ES-SCLC
Key Takeaways
- The updated NCCN guidelines recommend lurbinectedin with atezolizumab for maintenance therapy in ES-SCLC after initial chemoimmunotherapy.
- The IMforte trial showed a 46% reduction in disease progression risk with the combination therapy compared to atezolizumab alone.
New NCCN guidelines recommend lurbinectedin with atezolizumab as a first-line maintenance therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer, enhancing treatment options.
Updated National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) have added new recommendations for lurbinectedin (Zepzelca), based on data from the phase 3 IMforte trial (NCT05091567).1
The updated guidelines now have a primary treatment option for extensive-stage (ES) SCLC of carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1, etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3, and atezolizumab (Tecentriq) 1200 mg on day 1 every 21 days for 4 cycles followed by maintenance lurbinectedin 3.2 mg/m2 and atezolizumab 1200 mg on day 1 every 21 days.
The guidelines also suggest that physicians should consider adding lurbinectedin to maintenance atezolizumab in patients who have achieved at least stable disease following 4 induction cycles of chemoimmunotherapy, have an ECOG performance status of 0 to 1, and have no history of brain metastases. Additionally, the guidelines note that this regimen is not for retreatment in subsequent-line therapy if lurbinectedin has been used previously.
Data from IMforte were presented at the
IMforte also showed a clinically meaningful benefit to overall survival (OS) with a median of 13.2 months (95% CI, 11.9–16.4) with the doublet vs 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.5–12.2) with the monotherapy (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57–0.95; 2-sided P =.0174). The 12-month OS rates were 56.3% with the doublet vs 44.1% with the monotherapy.
“[The OS] also does not include the 3.2 months of induction therapy. The OS hazard ratio was 0.73, which, in my opinion, establishes this as a new standard of care for patients with small cell lung cancer,” said
In June, the
Lurbinectedin is an alkylating agent that works by binding to DNA, disrupting cell cycle progression and leading to cell death. It received
FAQs
What is the new recommendation in the updated NCCN guidelines for ES-SCLC?
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has incorporated a new primary treatment option for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The updated guidelines now recommend the addition of lurbinectedin (Zepzelca) to atezolizumab (Tecentriq) for maintenance therapy. This regimen follows the initial 4 cycles of standard chemoimmunotherapy, establishing a new therapeutic pathway for this patient population.
What clinical trial provided the evidence for this guideline change?
The evidence supporting this update comes from the pivotal phase 3 IMforte trial (NCT05091567). The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adding lurbinectedin to atezolizumab as a frontline maintenance therapy for patients with ES-SCLC, comparing this combination directly against maintenance with atezolizumab monotherapy.
How did the lurbinectedin combination impact progression-free survival (PFS)?
The addition of lurbinectedin to atezolizumab in the maintenance setting demonstrated a significant improvement in PFS compared with atezolizumab alone. This benefit translated to a substantial reduction in the risk of disease progression or death for patients receiving the combination therapy.
- Median PFS: The combination arm achieved a median PFS of 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.2–5.8), more than doubling the 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.6–2.7) observed in the monotherapy arm.
- Risk Reduction: This represented a 46% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death (Hazard Ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43–0.67; P <.0001).
- PFS Rates:
- 6-Month PFS: 41.2% for the combination vs. 18.7% for monotherapy.
- 12-Month PFS: 20.5% for the combination vs. 12.0% for monotherapy.
What was the reported benefit to overall survival (OS)?
The IMforte trial also reported a clinically meaningful benefit in Overall Survival (OS) for patients receiving the lurbinectedin and atezolizumab combination.
- Median OS: The median OS for the combination arm was 13.2 months (95% CI, 11.9–16.4) compared with 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.5–12.2) for the monotherapy arm.
- Risk Reduction: The statistical analysis showed an HR of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.57–0.95; P =.0174) in favor of the combination therapy.
- 12-Month OS Rates: The 12-month OS rate was 56.3% in the combination arm, compared with 44.1% in the monotherapy arm.





































