
PolyPEPI1018 Plus TAS-102 Shows Safety in Patients with MSS, Metastatic CRC
Key Takeaways
- PolyPEPI1018 and TAS-102 were safe and well-tolerated, with mild adverse events primarily being local injection-site reactions.
- The combination therapy induced T-cell and antibody responses, with a median overall survival of 8.7 months and progression-free survival of 4 months.
A phase 1b trial reveals the safety and potential efficacy of combining PolyPEPI1018 vaccine with TAS-102 in treating advanced colorectal cancer.
The combination of the multipeptide vaccine PolyPEPI1018 and standard chemotherapy trifluride/tipiracil (TAS-102) was shown to be safe and well-tolerated in patients with advanced, chemo-refractory, microsatellite-stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), according to phase 1b trial (NCT05130060) results published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology - Oncology Advances.1
Adverse events (AEs) attributed to PolyPEPI1018 were limited to grade 1 (60%) and grade 2 (33%) local injection-site reactions, which were mild and transient. The intensive vaccination schedule (every 2 weeks at 4 sites) was well-tolerated. No grade 4 AEs were attributed to the treatment.
The most common any grade AEs were fatigue (53.3%), neutrophil count decrease (46.7%), white blood cell decrease (40%), anemia (33.3%), nausea (26.7%), diarrhea, and dysgeusia (both at 13.3%).
The vaccine combination led to the development of both T-cell and antibody immune responses against the vaccine-targeted antigens.
Vaccine-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses were detected in all 5 patients with available samples.
There was also promising preliminary activity in the efficacy end points, with a median overall survival (OS) of 8.7 months (95% CI, 6.4–15.2) and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4 months (95% CI, 2.2–6.1). These figures compare favorably with the pivotal RECOURSE (NCT01607957)2 trial of TAS-102 monotherapy (median OS of 7.1 months, median PFS of 2 months).
MSS metastatic CRC is historically unresponsive to immunotherapy, creating a significant unmet medical need. In the patient population (n = 15), no patients achieved an objective tumor response, however, tumor shrinkage of some degree was observed in 4 patients. The disease control rate (DCR) was 53.3%, with 8 patients achieving stable disease as their best overall response.
Post hoc analysis revealed a stark and clinically significant difference in outcomes based on the presence of active liver metastases (LM). In patients without LM (n = 3), median PFS was 9.7 months, median OS was 14.8 months, and DCR was 100%.1
In patients with LM (n = 12), median PFS was 2.4 months, median OS was 7.2 months, and DCR was 42%.
These findings align with emerging data suggesting the liver's immunoprivileged environment is a major barrier to the success of immunotherapies in metastatic CRC.
The study also explored the use of a patient's HLA genotype to predict their potential to mount an effective immune response to the vaccine. A proprietary method was used to predict the number of vaccine antigens for which a patient could generate T-cell epitopes based on their specific HLA alleles.
Notably, patients predicted to have a broader immune response (AGP HIGH, ≥ 2 antigens) had a considerably longer median OS (10.3 months) than those predicted to have a narrower response (4.6 months) (AGP LOW, < 2 antigens).
This was a single-arm, open-label, investigator-initiated study. PolyPEPI1018 was administered subcutaneously at 4 sites on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. TAS-102 was administered orally twice daily on days 1–5 and 8–12 of each 28-day cycle. The median age of patients was 55 years (range, 31–71).
This study's relevance, as articulated by the Journal of Clinical Oncology - Oncology Advances’s associate editor Albiruni R. Abdul Razak, MB BCh, MRCPI, CCT, is that it "addresses the critical unmet need in [MSS] metastatic CRC, a setting where immunotherapy has historically shown minimal benefit. By combining the novel multi-peptide vaccine PolyPEPI1018 with TAS-102, the trial demonstrates that chemo-immunotherapeutic strategies can elicit tumor-specific immune responses and signal potential survival benefit, laying groundwork for future treatment development in this resistant disease type."





































