
Orca-T Earns FDA Priority Review in Heme Malignancies
Key Takeaways
- Orca-T's BLA has been accepted for priority review by the FDA, targeting hematologic malignancies like AML, ALL, and MDS.
- The phase 3 Precision-T study showed Orca-T significantly improved survival free of chronic GVHD compared with alloHSCT.
The FDA prioritizes Orca-T's review for treating hematologic malignancies, promising improved survival and reduced complications compared with traditional therapies.
The FDA has accepted for priority review the biologics license application (BLA) for Orca-T, an investigational allogeneic T-cell immunotherapy, for the treatment of hematologic malignancies including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).1
The FDA has set a Prescription Drug User Fee Act target action date of April 6, 2026.
“A stem cell transplant has been the only potentially curative option for many people with AML, ALL or MDS; however, treatment-related toxicities too often hinder patient recovery. Acceptance of the Orca-T BLA marks a pivotal moment in our ability to deliver a first-in-class therapy designed to improve survival free from complications like graft-vs-host disease [GVHD],” Nate Fernhoff, PhD, cofounder and CEO at Orca Bio, said a press release.
“Supported by positive phase 3 clinical data [NCT0401368], today’s regulatory milestone reflects important recognition of the transformative potential of Orca-T. We look forward to working collaboratively with the FDA on the review of our application with the goal of advancing Orca-T and making it available to patients in need,” Fernhoff added.
The
As of March 2025, an interim analysis of the secondary end point of overall survival (OS) showed that OS was 94% (95% CI, 86%-97%) in the Orca-T arm vs 83% (95% CI, 73%-90%) in the alloHSCT arm (HR, 0.49; P =.11823). The rates of cumulative incidence of moderate to severe cGVHD were 13% (95% CI, 5%-23%) in the Orca-T arm vs 44% (95% CI, 31%-56%) in the alloHSCT arm (HR, 0.19; P <.00002).
Precision-T, a randomized, open-label, multicenter study, evaluated the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of Orca-T vs conventional alloHSCT across multiple hematologic malignancies.3 Across both groups, patients received myeloablative conditioning and used a related or unrelated matched donor.
Orca-T was previously granted regenerative medicine advanced therapy and orphan drug designations from the FDA for the prevention of GVHD or death in patients eligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant.2
Additional findings from Precision-T showed that for exploratory end points at 1 year, the rate of relapse-free survival was 76% vs 74% in the Orca-T and alloHSCT arms, respectively (HR, 0.80; P =.49). In the Orca-T and alloHSCT arms, the cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 3% and 13%, respectively, and the cumulative incidence of grade 3 or 4 acute GVHD was 6% and 17%, respectively.
There were also no new safety issues seen with Orca-T. Infections deemed grade 4 or greater per CTCAE scoring were observed in 6% and 10% of patients in the Orca-T and alloHSCT arms, respectively.
The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 96% (95% CI, 88%-99%), 88% (95% CI, 78%-94%), and 86% (95% CI, 73%-92%), respectively, in the cohort of Orca-T–treated patients (n = 77). Patients from the CIBMTR registry who received PTCy after alloHSCT (n = 293) achieved 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates of 82% (95% CI, 78%-87%), 73% (95% CI, 68%-79%), and 67% (95% CI, 61%-74%), respectively.





































