
FDA Approves Lurbinectedin/Atezolizumab for ES-SCLC Maintenance
Key Takeaways
- The FDA approved lurbinectedin and atezolizumab for first-line maintenance in ES-SCLC, with the combination showing improved progression-free and overall survival.
- The IMforte trial data demonstrated a 46% reduction in disease progression or death risk and a 27% reduction in death risk with the combination therapy.
The FDA approves lurbinectedin and atezolizumab for first-line maintenance in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer, significantly enhancing survival rates.
The FDA has approved the combination of lurbinectedin (Zepzelca) and atezolizumab (Tecentriq) or atezolizumab and hyaluronidase-tqjs (Tecentriq Hybrezas) as a first-line maintenance treatment in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) whose disease has not progressed following first-line induction therapy with atezolizumab, carboplatin, and etoposide.1
The approval is supported by data from the phase 3 IMforte trial (NCT05091567) of lurbinectedin plus atezolizumab, which met both primary end points and demonstrated statistically significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with atezolizumab monotherapy.
Data from IMforte were presented at the
Regarding safety, no new or unexpected safety signals were reported.2 The most common adverse events (AEs) experienced by at least 10% of those in the lurbinectedin/atezolizumab and atezolizumab-alone arms were nausea (36.4% vs 4.2%), anemia (31.8% vs 6.7%), fatigue (20.2% vs 7.9%), decreased appetite (16.9% vs 6.7%), decreased platelet count (15.3% vs 2.9%), diarrhea (14.0% vs 7.5%), vomiting (13.6% vs 2.5%), asthenia (12.8% vs 6.3%), thrombocytopenia (12.8% vs 1.7%), decreased neutrophil count (12.8% vs 1.3%), constipation (12.0% vs 6.3%), and neutropenia (10.7% vs 1.7%).3
AEs led to dose interruption or modification of any drug for 38.0% of patients in the experimental arm vs 13.8% of those in the control arm, and to discontinuation of any drug for 6.2% and 3.3% of patients, respectively. The rate of serious AEs was higher in the doublet arm than in the monotherapy arm (31.0% vs 17.1%).
“A significant challenge with small cell lung cancer is the high rate of attrition at relapse; many patients, sometimes over half, do not receive further therapy. This is because the cancer often returns very aggressively, leaving patients unfit or unwell for additional treatment. Therefore, there's a critical need to prevent progression and maintain disease control proactively, rather than waiting for relapse. This trial aimed to address this by exploring a maintenance strategy using lurbinectedin. While maintenance strategies are logical, there hadn't been a positive study showing improved survival with such an approach until this trial,” said





































