
FDA Approves Guardant 360 CDx With Imlunestrant in ESR1+ Breast Cancer
Key Takeaways
- The FDA approved Guardant 360 CDx for identifying ESR1 mutations in advanced breast cancer patients eligible for imlunestrant treatment.
- Imlunestrant showed a 38% reduction in disease progression risk compared to standard endocrine therapy in the EMBER-3 trial.
FDA approves imlunestrant for advanced breast cancer, enhancing treatment options for patients with ESR1 mutations through innovative genomic profiling.
The FDA has approved the Guardant 360 CDx as a companion diagnostic to identify ESR1 mutation in patients with advanced breast cancer who may benefit from treatment with imlunestrant (Inluriyo).1
On September 25, the
“This FDA approval provides another treatment for breast cancer patients with ESR1 mutations for their specific type of cancer along with expanded access to comprehensive genomic profiling with a simple blood draw,” said Helmy Eltoukhy, Guardant Health chairman and co-CEO, in a press release. “Precision testing plays a critical role in helping physicians identify the correct treatment, providing patients and their doctors with the comprehensive genomic profiling needed to see if they are eligible to receive the right treatment and improving outcomes.”
Guardant 360 CDx was used in the
In the overall population, the median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI, 5.3–7.3) with imlunestrant monotherapy (n = 331) compared with 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.6–5.6) for endocrine therapy (n = 330; HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.72–1.04; P =.12). Notably, there was no statistical difference in PFS between the 2 arms for patients without ESR1 mutations (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.79–1.27).
In patients with measurable disease in the overall population, the investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) was 12% (95% CI, 8%–16%) with imlunestrant (n = 262) vs 8% (95% CI, 5%–12%) with endocrine therapy (n = 251). The ORR was 14% (95% CI, 8%–21%) for imlunestrant alone (n = 112) vs 8% (95% CI, 2%–13%) for endocrine therapy (n = 91) in the ESR1-mutated population; the respective ORRs were 11% (95% CI, 6%–16%) and 9% (95% CI, 4%–13%) for imlunestrant (n = 150) and endocrine therapy (n = 160) in the population without ESR1 mutations.
Safety data showed that any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in 83% of patients in the imlunestrant monotherapy arm (n = 327) vs 84% of patients in the endocrine therapy arm (n = 334). The rates of grade 3 or higher TEAEs were 17% and 21%, respectively. The most common any-grade TEAEs reported in at least 10% of patients included fatigue (imlunestrant, 23%; endocrine therapy, 13%), diarrhea (21%; 12%), nausea (17%; 13%), arthralgia (14%; 14%), increased aspartate aminotransferase levels (13%; 13%), back pain (11%; 7%), increased alanine aminotransferase levels (10%; 10%), anemia (10%; 13%), and constipation (10%; 6%).
Serious AEs were reported in 10% of patients in the imlunestrant arm vs 12% of patients in the endocrine therapy arm. In the imlunestrant monotherapy arm, AEs led to dose reductions, treatment discontinuation, and death in 2%, 4%, and 2% of patients, respectively. These respective rates were 0%, 1%, and 1% in the endocrine therapy group.





































