
Targeted Therapies in Oncology
- September I 2025
- Volume 14
- Issue 11
Belzutifan Extends Quality-Adjusted Survival Time in Advanced RCC
Key Takeaways
- Belzutifan improved quality-adjusted survival time over everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma, with a mean Q-TWiST of 17.47 months versus 14.81 months.
- Despite longer grade 3/4 toxicity duration with belzutifan, it showed superior progression-free survival and quality of life benefits.
Belzutifan shows improved quality-adjusted survival in advanced renal cell carcinoma compared with everolimus, enhancing patient quality of life and treatment outcomes.
Belzutifan (Welireg) improved quality-adjusted survival time over everolimus eranicle among patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), although the time patients spent with grade 3/4 toxicity before disease progression (TOX) was numerically longer with belzutifan, according to results from a quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis of the phase 3 LITESPARK-005 trial (NCT04195750).1
Findings from the main analysis, which were presented at the 2025 Kidney Cancer Research Summit, showed that the mean Q-TWiST was 17.47 months among patients who received belzutifan (n = 374) vs 14.81 months among those who received everolimus (n = 372; difference, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.06-4.49). The relative gain in Q-TWiST with belzutifan, defined as the absolute Q-TWiST difference divided by the mean overall survival (OS) for the everolimus arm, was 11.32% (range, 4.49%-19.09%) in the main analysis.
The sensitivity analysis, which included grade 1 to 4 serious adverse events (AEs), showed a mean Q-TWiST of 17.50 months in the belzutifan arm vs 15.03 months in the everolimus arm (difference, 2.47; 95% CI, 0.81-4.28). Data highlighted a relative Q-TWiST gain of 10.50% (range, 3.44%18.18%) in the sensitivity analysis.
"In conclusion, belzutifan outperformed everolimus from a response and a progression-free-survival [PFS] perspective. The toxicity profile was distinct, the quality of life was better, and so was the TWiST and the Q-TWiST analysis,” lead study investigator Thomas Powles, MBBS, MCRP, MD, stated in the presentation.1 “This [Q-TWiST analysis] does help patients and doctors make decisions. I quite like this type of exploratory analysis, and I’m happy to be involved in future projects with it.”
Powles is a professor of genitourinary oncology, lead for solid tumor research, and director of Barts Cancer Centre at St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Queen Mary University of London.
As part of this analysis, investigators divided patient survival time following randomization into 3 mutually exclusive states: investigator-assessed time with grade 3/4 AEs before disease progression, time without symptoms and progression of grade 3/4 toxicity (TWiST), and time from progression until death (REL). Investigators calculated Q-TWiST as the sum-product of restricted mean time spent in the individual states and state-specific utility weights.
The study authors summarized the treatment effects as differences in restricted mean time spent in each state; the difference in Q-TWiST; and the relative gain in Q-TWiST, or the absolute Q-TWiST difference divided by mean OS in the everolimus arm. Use of nonparametric bootstrapping method was involved for generating 95% CIs for the treatment differences related to the health states and Q-TWiST.
In the multicenter, open-label LITESPARK-005 trial, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive belzutifan at 120 mg or everolimus at 10 mg orally once daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.2
The trial’s dual primary end points were PFS based on blinded independent central review per RECIST v1.1 criteria and OS. Secondary end points included the objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 guidelines, duration of response, and safety.
In the main analysis, the mean TOX time was 1.45 months in the belzutifan arm vs 1.22 months in the everolimus arm (difference, 0.23; 95% CI, –0.29 to 0.76). Despite a numerically longer time in TOX among those in the belzutifan arm, data showed significantly longer time in TWiST with belzutifan at a mean of 10.73 months vs 6.07 months with everolimus, which was driven by prolonged periods without progression (difference, 4.66 months; 95% CI, 3.28-6.02). Prior safety data showed that the most common any-grade AEs in the belzutifan and everolimus arms, respectively, included anemia (83.1% vs 57.2%), fatigue (32.3% vs 25.8%), nausea (18.5% vs 12.2%), edema peripheral (17.2% vs 18.1%), and constipation (16.9% vs 8.3%).
REFERENCES:
1. Powles T, de Velasco G, Choueiri TK, et al. Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis of belzutifan versus everolimus in previously treated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC): LITESPARK-005 (LS-005). Presented at the 2025 Kidney Cancer Research Summit; July 17-18, 2025; Boston, MA. Abstract 13.
2. Choueiri TK, Powles T, Peltola K, et al. LITESPARK-005 Investigators. Belzutifan versus everolimus for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(8):710-721. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2313906.
Articles in this issue
3 months ago
Pembrolizumab Plus Lenvatinib Delivers in nccRCC3 months ago
6 Must-Have AI Features in Practice Management




































