
AQUILA Trial: Closing the Care Gap in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
Dr. Peter Voorhees discusses the AQUILA study's impact on treating high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma, paving the way for new therapies.
In an interview with Targeted Oncology, Peter Voorhees, MD, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute and Wake Forest University School of Medicine, pinpoints the treatment gap in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (HR-SMM) that the phase 3 AQUILA study (NCT03301220) of subcutaneous daratumumab sought to address, ultimately resulting in the agent’s
Read the full interview
Historically, there was no clear standard of care nor regulatory approvals for therapy for SMM prior to the AQUILA study. The lingering, motivating question at the time was whether intervention prior to the development of active multiple myeloma (MM), rather than upon or after development, was valuable for long-term clinical outcomes.
Dr Voorhees details 2 precursor randomized trials in patients with SMM that supported this path of investigation:
- The phase 3 QUIREDEX study (NCT00480363): Conducted by the Spanish Myeloma Group, this trial compared combination therapy of lenalidomide (Revlimid) with dexamethasone for 2 years against active monitoring, showing that lenalidomide treatment reduced the risk of progression to active MM and even conferred an overall survival advantage.
- The phase 3 ECOG study (NCT01169337): Comparing lenalidomide monotherapy vs active monitoring, this trial also demonstrated a reduction in the risk of progression to active MM, and that the patients with HR-SMM derived the most benefit.
These trials set the stage for the AQUILA trial and established the target population for the trial and FDA approval — those who have a 50% likelihood of developing active MM over the first 2 years of monitoring.




































